Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Kebutuhan Informasi Caregivers Keluarga (K-KICK)

Sri Rahayu, Teti Rahmawati

Abstract


 

Latar Belakang: Kebutuhan informasi caregivers keluarga sampai sejauh ini belum teridentifikasi secara jelas. Namun, belum ada sebuah instrumen yang mampu mengukur kebutuhan tersebut di Indonesia.

Tujuan: untuk mengukur validitas dan reliabilitas kuesioner kebutuhan informasi caregivers keluarga.

Metode Penelitian: Validasi konten atau content validity index (CVI) yang melibatkan 5 orang ahli dan reliabilitas dengan alpha Cronbach digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Sejumlah 28 orang caregivers keluarga terlibat dalam uji reliabilitas.

Hasil: Kuesioner kebutuhan informasi caregivers keluarga (K-KICK) dinyatakan valid dengan nilai mean I-CVI 0,97 dan reliabel dengan alpha Cronbach 0,89. Oleh dari itu, kuesioner ini dapat digunakan untuk penelitian selanjutnya dengan populasi yang sama atau berbeda dengan jumlah sampel yang lebih besar.

Kata kunci: uji validitas, reliabilitas, kebutuhan informasi, K-KICK, caregivers keluarga

 

Background: The informational needs of family caregivers until now have not been identified clearly. However, there is no instrument available to measure these needs in Indonesia.

Objective: To measure the validity and reliability of the questionnaire information needs of family caregivers.

Methods: Content validity test (CVI) involving 5 experts and reliability using Cronbach alpha were used in this study. A total of 28 family caregivers were involved in the reliability test.

Results: The questionnaire “Kuesioner kebutuhan informasi caregivers keluarga (K-KICK)” was declared valid with a mean I-CVI of 0.97 and reliable with Cronbach's alpha 0.89. Finally, this questionnaire can be used in further studies with the same or different populations and with larger sample size.

Keywords: validity test, reliability, informational needs, K-KICK, family caregivers 


Full Text:

FULL TEXT PDF

References


Collins, L., & K Swartz. (2011). Caregiver care. American Family Physician, 1309. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e43d/2b346b994f0043e46a2158f356bac6952466.pdf

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02310555

Etemadifar, S., Shahriari, M., Farsani, A., & Bahrami, M. (2014).

Informational needs and related problems of family caregivers of heart failure patients: A qualitative study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 3(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.145908

Gillick, M. (2014). The Critical Role of Caregivers in Achieving. JAMA : The Journal of the American Medical Association, 2, 11–12.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.7310.Conflict

Ikawati, Z. (2015). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Hidup Pasien Gagal Jantung Kronik Factors That Influence Quality of Life in Chronic Heart Failure ( Chf ). Jurnal Keperawatan Soedirman (The Soedirman Journal of Nursing), 2015, 259–266.

Indrayana, S., & Fang, S. Y. (2019). Validitas dan reliabilitas The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire versi Bahasa Indonesia pada Pasien Diabetes Mellitus. Dinamika Kesehatan Jurnal Kebidanan Dan Keperawatan, 10(1).

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382–385.

National Alliance for Caregiving. (2015). Caregiving in the U.S.- AARP 2015 Report. Bethesda, Md: National Alliance for Caregiving; 2015. Retrieved from https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/ppi/2015/caregiving-in-the-united-states-2015-report-revised.pdf. Diakses pada tanggal 7 Agustus 2019

National Alliance for Caregiving, & AARP. (2004). Caregiving in the U.S., (April), 1–83.

National Alliance for Caregiving, & AARP. (2009). A Focused Look at Those Caring for Someone Age 50 or Older. Caregiving in the U.S., (November), 1–79.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

Rahayu, S. (2017). 印尼心臟衰竭病人之家屬照顧者的衛教需求. 成功大學護理學系學位論文, 1–77. Retrieved from http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=U0026-0802201717114900

Rahayu, S., & Chen, H. M. (2019). Penerjemahan dan validasi konten kuesioner “Educational needs of caregivers instrument” ke Bahasa Indonesia untuk caregivers keluarga pasien gagal jantung. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Keperawatan, Process In Review.

Rahayu, S., & Fajarini, M., Setiawan, A. (2018). Content validity of Evidence Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ). In The 2nd International Nursing Scholars Congress, Universitas Indonesia (p. 67).

Rahayu, S., & Rahmawati, T. (2019). Karakteristik dan kesediaan caregivers keluarga dari pasien kronis tentang pembentukan support group. Jurnal Ilmiah Keperawatan Altruistik, 2(2), 53–63.

Swartz, K., & Collins, L. G. (2019). Caregiver Care. American Family Physician, 99(11).

Waltz, C.F., Strickland, O.L., & Lenz, E. R. (2005). Measurement in nursing and health research (3rd ed.). New York: Springer Publishing Co.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33859/dksm.v10i2.513

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Sri Rahayu, Teti Rahmawati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.