Hubungan Jenis Kelamin dengan Tingkat Pengetahuan Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) pada Mahasiswa
Abstract
Latar Belakang: Pendidikan Seksual merupakan bagian penting dalam mendukung program SDGs untuk menjamin kehidupan yang sehat serta menjamin kesetaraan gender. Pendidikan seksual menjadi salah satu upaya pencegahan peningkatan penyakit menular seksual (PMS), HIV AIDS, perilaku seksual, dan permasalahan terkait hak gender. Survei Data Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia (2017) menyebutkan 2% wanita usia 15-24 tahun dan 8% laki-laki usia 15-24 tahun melakukan hubungan seksual sebelum pernikahan. CDC (2019) menyebutkan bahwa setengah dari penderita IMS baru adalah pasien usia 15-24 tahun. Hal ini tentu akan mempengaruhi kualitas hidup remaja dan generasi selanjutnya.Selama ini upaya peningkatan pengetahuan seksual melalui pemberian informasi telah dilakukan, namun belum optimal. Pendidikan yang disesuaikan dengan usia dan jenis kelamin dapat menjadi salah satu strategi dalam peningkatan pengetahuan seksual.
Tujuan: Menganalisis hubungan antara jenis kelamin dengan tingkat pengetahuan Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) pada Mahasiswa.
Metode: Penelitian menggunakan metode survei analitik dengan desain survei cross sectional, pengumpulan data melalui survei kuesioner. Jumlah sampel sebanyak 248 responden dengan teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan purposive sampling, teknik non probability sampling. Analisis menggunakan uji chi square.
Hasil: Hasil uji statistik menunjukkan bahwa adanya hubungan yang signifikan jenis kelamin dengan tingkat pengetahuan Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) dengan nilai sig2 tailed sebesar 0,006 (< 0,05). Simpulan: Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) melaui pendekatan usia dan jenis kelamin dapat menjadi salah satu strategi dalam upaya pencegahan permasalahan terkait seksual.
Kata Kunci : Pendidikan seksual, CSE, remaja
Relationship of Gender and Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE)
Knowledge Levels for Students
Background: Sexual education is an important part in supporting the SDGs program to ensure a healthy life and gender equality. Sexual education is one of the efforts to prevent an increase in sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), HIV AIDS, sexual behavior, and issues related to gender rights. The Indonesian Demographic and Health Data Survey (2017) stated that 2% of women aged 15-24 years and 8% of men aged 15-24 years had sexual relations before marriage. The CDC (2019) states that half of new STI sufferers are patients aged 15-24 years. This will certainly affect the quality of life of adolescents and the next generation. So far, efforts to increase sexual knowledge through the provision of information have been carried out, but have not been optimal. Education that is adjusted to age and gender can be one strategy in increasing sexual knowledge.
Objective: To analyze the relationship between gender and the level of knowledge of Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) in students.
Methods: This study uses an analytical survey method with a cross-sectional survey design, data collection through a questionnaire survey. A total of 248 respondents, using purposive sampling, non-probability sampling technique. Analysis using chi square test.
Results: The results of statistical tests showed that there was a significant relationship between gender and the level of knowledge of Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE), p value 0.006 (<0.05).
Conclusion: Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) based age-gender can be a strategy in preventing sexual problems.
Keywords: Sexual education, CSE, youth
Full Text:
FULL TEXT PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Andari ID, Woro O, Yuniastuti A. (2019). The Effect of Knowledge, Attitude, and Parents Behavior Towards Sex Education Parents With Sexual Violence Incident. Public Health Perspectives Journal, 4 (2): 141-148.
Ashcraft AM & MurrayPJ.(2017).Talking to Parents About Adolescent Sexuality. Pediatric clinics of North America, 64(2): 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2016.11.002
Bodnar K & Tornello SL. (2019). Does Sex Education Help Everyone?: Sex Education Exposure and Timing as Predictors of Sexual Health Among Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Young Women, Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 29(1): 8-26. DOI: 10.1080/10474412.2018.1482219
Cleland J. (2001). Illustrative Questionnaire for InterviewSurveys with Young People. World Health Organization.
de Castro F, Rojas-Martínez R, Villalobos-Hernández A, Allen-Leigh B, Breverman- Bronstein A, Billings DL, et al. (2018). Sexual and reproductive health outcomes are positively associated with comprehensive sexual education exposure in Mexican high-school students. PLoS ONE 13(3): e0193780. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193780
Ezer P, Kerr L, Fisher CM, Heywood W, & Lucke J. (2019). Australian students’ experiences of sexuality education at school. Sex Education, 1–17. doi:10.1080/14681811.2019.1566896
Fonte VRF da, Spindola T, Francisco MTR, Sodré CP, André NLN de O, & Pinheiro CDP. (2018). Young university students and the knowledge about sexually transmitted infections. Escola Anna Nery, 22(2). doi:10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2017-0318
Joodaki K, Nedjat S, Vahid Dastjerdi M, Larijani B. (2020). Ethical considerations and challenges of sex education for adolescents in Iran: a qualitative study. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 13(2): 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v13i2.2664
Kantor L dan Levitz N. (2017). Parent’s view on sex education in schools: How much do Democrats and Republicans agree?. PLoS ONE, 2(7): e0180250. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180250
King BM, Scott AE, Van Doorn EM, Abele EE & McDevitt ME. (2019). Reasons students at a US University do or do not enrol in a human sexuality course. Sex Education, 20 (1): 101-109, https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2019.1606793
Li C, Cheng Z, Wu T, Liang X, Gaoshan J, Li L, Hong P, Tang K. (2017). The relationships of school-based sexuality education, sexual knowledge and sexual behaviors—a study of 18,000 Chinese college students. Reproductive Health, 14(1). doi:10.1186/s12978-017-0368-4
Mahmudah, Yaunin Y, Lestari Y. (2016). Faktor-faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Perilaku Seksual Remaja di Kota Padang. Jurnal Kesehatan Andalas, 5(2): 448-455.
Mansor N, Ahmad N, Rahman HA. (2020). Determinants of knowledge on sexually transmitted infections among students in public higher education institutions in Melaka state, Malaysia. PLoS ONE, 15(10): e0240842. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240842
Milner V, Mulekar M, Turrens J. (2015). Parent’s Belief Regardibg Sex Education fo their Children in Sothern Alabama Public Schools. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12(2): 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0180-2
Nagpal A dan Fernandes C. (2015). Attitude of Parents towards Sex Education. The International Journal of India Psychology, 2(4): 38-43.
Notoatmodjo, S. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Nsuami, J., L. Sanders, and S. Taylor. (2010). Knowledge of Sexually Transmitted Infections among High School Students. American Journal of Health Education, 41 (4): 206–217.
Ohee C dan Purnomo W. (2018). Pengaruh Status Hubungan Berpacaran terhadap Perilaku Pacaran Beresiko pada Mahasiswa Perantau Asal Papua di Kota Surabaya. The Indonesian Journal of Public Health, 13 (2): 268-280. doi: 10.20473/ijph.vl13il.2018.268-280
Pharr J R, Enejoh V, O. Mavegam B, Olutola A, Karick H, et al. (2017). A Cross-Sectional Study of the Role of HIV/AIDS Knowledge in Risky Sexual Behaviors of Adolescents in Nigeria. Int J High Risk Behav Addict, 6(4):e63203. doi:10.5812/ijhrba.63203
Pradikto B & Sofino. (2019). Sex Education in Family: Study on Children Living Far Apart with The Family. Journal of Nonformal Education, 5 (2): 132-137. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/jne.v5i2.20786
Riyanto A. 2011. Pengolahan dan Analisis Data Kesehatan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
Santangelo OE, Provenzano S, & Firenze A. (2018). Knowledge of Sexually Transmitted Infection and Sex-at-risk among Italian Students of Health Professions. Data from a one-month Survey. Ann Ist Super Sanità, Vol. 54, No. 1: 40-48. DOI:10.4415/ANN_18_01_09
Sastroasmoro S, Ismael S. (2014). Dasar-dasar Metodelogi Penelitian Klinis. Edisi 5. Jakarta: Sagung Seto. Hal 104-382.
Smith TE, Panisch LS, Malespin T, & Pereira MG. (2017). Evaluating Effectiveness of Abstinence Education. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 14(5), 360–367. doi:10.1080/23761407.2017.13408
Sujarweni VW. 2014. Metode Penelitian: Lengkap, Praktis, dan Mudah dipahami. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.
Thin Zaw PP, McNeil E Oo K, Liabsuetrakul T, & Htay TT. (2020). Abstinence-only or comprehensive sex education at Myanmar schools: preferences and knowledge among students, teachers, parents and policy makers. Sex Education, 1–16. doi:10.1080/14681811.2020.17490
UNESCO. (2018). International technical guidance on sexuality education: an evidence-informed approach (PDF). Paris: UNESCO, 15-80. ISBN 978-92-3-100259-5. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260770
Von Rosen F, von Rosen A, Müller-Riemenschneider F, Damberg I, & Tinnemann P. (2018). STI Knowledge in Berlin Adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(1), 110. doi:10.3390/ijerph15010110
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33859/dksm.v12i2.736
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Paul Joae Brett Nito, Cynthia Eka Fayuning Tjomiadi, Onieqie Ayu Dhea Manto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.